![]() ![]() (This story has not been edited by Devdiscourse staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed. In a statement, Pemex said, "It will continue to report on the control, extinction of the fire and damage assessment throughout the day." (ANI) In a press conference, Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador said that Pemex firefighters were battling the blaze and the Mexican Navy was also involved in the efforts, according to CNN. Speaking to CNN, some employees of other platforms said that the flames can be seen from the nearby platforms, indicating that the incident is of considerable magnitude. On July 2, in the Gulf of Mexico, a gas leak from an. ![]() He stated that the company is now focusing its efforts to find the missing person and starting operations again. The idea of Earth on fire is used as a metaphor for the climate crisis, but earlier this month, the ocean was literally ablaze. According to Oropeza, Pemex is carrying out an investigation to find the cause of the fire. Romero Oropeza said the part of the platform where the fire erupted has been completely destroyed, the report said. He said that the victims were not from Pemex company. In a video shared by Pemex on Twitter, Pemex Director Romero Oropeza said two people who died and the one missing are from the company that was working from the company that was working at the facility, CNN reported. Earlier, Petroleos Mexicanos (Pemex) said that at least six people were wounded. Four boats have been sent to contain the fire on the oil platform. Around 321 workers out of the 328 who were working on the structure when the fire broke out have been evacuated, Pemex said. Image Credit: ANIĪt least two people were killed and one person is missing after a fire erupted at the Nohoch Alfa offshore platform at the Bay of Campeche, in the Gulf of Mexico on Friday, CNN reported citing the state-owned oil company Petroleos Mexicanos (Pemex) statement. Workers said that, while they were aware of unsafe practices on the rig, they were afraid to report mistakes for fear of reprisals.Ī BP spokesman said last night: "The investigations continue to demonstrate that a range of things went wrong and that responsibility lies with a whole load of different companies.ANI | Updated: 08-07-2023 09:18 IST | Created: 08-07-2023 09:18 IST Representative Image. The New York Times reported earlier this week that a survey of workers carried out by Transocean shortly before the blast suggested key safety practices had not been followed. Pressure is now likely to mount on Transocean to explain the discrepancies. ![]() The system failed to indicate that a vital valve inside the blowout preventer, the device designed to shut down the well in case of problems, had been damaged. In a third significant disclosure, Williams also revealed that a computer system used to monitor the drill shack was constantly freezing up, and on one occasion even produced wrong information. Matter of fact, the entire fleet runs them in bypass." Hay responded: "Damn thing been in bypass for five years. When he saw that the system had been bypassed, Williams protested to a Transocean supervisor, Mark Hay, who dismissed his concerns. Its not looking pretty lately.If you want here is my paypal address: http. He also revealed that a crucial safety device, designed to shut down the drill shack in the case of dangerous gas levels being detected, had been disabled, or bypassed as it is called. From heat anomalies to rig explosions, were keeping an eye on the Gulf of Mexico. Williams' testimony will raise questions about whether lives could have been saved had the alarms been properly set and the disaster mitigated. When he asked why, he said he was told that the view from even the most senior Transocean official on the rig had been that "they did not want people woken up at three o'clock in the morning due to false alarms". Williams said he discovered that the physical alarm system had been disabled a full year before the disaster. Of the 126 crew on board the rig on 20 April, seven worked for BP and 79 for Transocean. It switches the spotlight of blame away from BP and towards the subcontractor which took the decisions. The evidence of deliberate dilution of the rig's safety mechanisms is likely to have wide ramifications for BP and Transocean, the world's largest offshore drilling company. Sensors monitoring conditions on the rig and in the Macondo oil well beneath it were still working, but the computer had been instructed not to trigger any alarms in case of adverse readings.īoth visual and sound alarms should have gone off in the case of sensors detecting fire or dangerous levels of combustible or toxic gases. Williams told the hearing today that no alarms went off on the day of the explosion because they had been "inhibited". Mike Williams, who was in charge of maintaining the rig's electronic systems, was giving evidence to the federal panel in New Orleans that is investigating the cause of the disaster on 20 April, which killed 11 people. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |